Re: SVGT 1.2 Tests: Use of <tspan> with x, y, dx, and dy

Hi Kalle,

This is the official response from the SVG WG. Thank you for pointing 
out the fixes required to the SVG Tiny 1.2 Test Suite.

Your email prompted me to go through all the tests in the Tiny 1.2 Test 
Suite and fix any positional attributes on <tspan> elements. The 
following tests have been fixed:

fonts-glyph-201-t
fonts-glyph-202-t
struct-common-201-t
struct-common-201-t-debug
text-align-203-t (replaced text-align-03-t)
text-fonts-202-t
text-fonts-203-t
udom-dom-210-t
udom-event-202-t
udom-event-203-t
udom-event-204-t
udom-event-205-t
udom-event-207-t
udom-event-208-t
udom-event-209-t
udom-smil-202-t


These fixes will appear in the next release of the SVG Tiny 1.2 Test Suite.

Thank you again for your feedback.


Kind Regards,


Anthony Grasso

Software Engineer

Canon Information Systems Research Australia
Phone: +61 2 8873 8821
Email: anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au


Kalle Raita wrote:
> Hi,
>  
> The spec says that tspan element cannot be have positional attributes:
> 
> 10.5 The 'tspan' element:
> ... Positional attributes such as x, y, dx, dy and rotate are not
> available on 'tspan' in SVG Tiny 1.2.
>  
> However, following cases have tspan elements that use positional
> attributes.
> fonts-glyph-201-t
> text-fonts-202-t
> udom-dom-210-t
> udom-event-202-t
> udom-event-203-t
> udom-event-204-t
> udom-event-207-t
> udom-smil-202-t
> 
> Yours, 
>   - Kalle
> 
> Kalle Raita 
> NVIDIA Corporation 
> Tel. +358 40 723 1441 
> kraita@nvidia.com 
> http://eu.nvidia.com <http://eu.nvidia.com/>  
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
> confidential information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
> is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
> reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2008 22:41:12 UTC