Re: CSP formal objection.

* Hill, Brad wrote:
>I think the removal of the text simply leaves the matter open to each 
>user agent to implement the interactions between CSP and add-ons 
>according to their own best ability and whatever priority of 
>constituencies they already follow.  It neither implies interference nor 
>non-interference.

We are all familiar with the fact that removing a requirement leaves the
matter covered by the requirement "open", thank you. That has nothing to
do with what I wrote, though.
-- 
Bj�rn H�hrmann � mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de � http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 � Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 � http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dageb�ll � PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 � http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2014 19:42:24 UTC