Re: [WNET] Schemas online

Hi Aldo,

Remember that these statements were specifically added so that both RDFS 
and OWL software could interpret the same schema file.

Of course the same effect could be reached by inserting that OWL 
Datatype/ObjectProperty are subClassOf rdf:Property, but then there 
would be no choice to keep them separate in other loaded files. The 
solution in the current files at least is the one which makes the least 
commitment. And I don't think it is a disallowed solution in RDF or OWL.

Given the fact that the files load in the other editors I think we can 
keep them like this.

Cheers,
Mark.

Aldo Gangemi wrote:
> 
> Thanks Mark. Re: Protege load, just remove from the file the list of 
> properties that are later reintroduced as object properties (also, I 
> don't see the need to introduce them as properties, and then as object 
> properties):
> 
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;attribute" />
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;causes" />
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;classifiedBy" />
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;classifiedByUsage" />
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;classifiedByRegion" />
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;classifiedByTopic" />
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;entails" />
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;gloss" />
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;hyponymOf" />
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;lexicalForm" />
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;meronymOf" />
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;substanceMeronymOf" />
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;partMeronymOf" />
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;memberMeronymOf" />
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;sameVerbGroupAs" />
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;similarTo" />
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;synsetId" />
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;tagCount" />
> 
> Moreover, the object proeprty "similarTo" is symmetric, then at least we 
> should indicate its inverse as being the same.
> 
> Cheers
> Aldo
> 
> At 16:37 +0300 10-05-2006, Mark van Assem wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The schemas for WordNet Basic and Full are online [1]. They 
>> validate/load in the W3C RDF Validator [2], the WonderWeb OWL 
>> validator [3], Triple20 [4] and SWOOP [5]. They do not load in Protege 
>> Full 3.2 Beta [6], for a reason I do not understand.
>>
>> A few remaining questions/comments:
>>
>> - I used XML Schema Datatypes also for e.g. the gloss and lexicalForm 
>> properties, but I can recall that when properties have an XSD as range 
>> then the actual glosses and lexical forms are not supplied with the 
>> XML lang attribute. If this is correct, I should probably change to 
>> rdfs:Literal?
>>
>> - there are two properties that are subPropertyOf rdfs:label / 
>> rdfs:comment. The OWL validator complains that the rdfs properties 
>> should be DatatypeProperties. Is this an issue?
>>
>> - I have not cleaned the rdfs:comments in the schema files yet.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mark.
>>
>> [1]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/schemas/
>> [2]http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/
>> [3]http://phoebus.cs.man.ac.uk:9999/OWL/Validator
>> [4]http://www.swi-prolog.org/packages/Triple20/
>> [5]http://www.mindswap.org/2004/SWOOP/
>> [6]http://protege.stanford.edu/download/registered.html
>>
>>
>> Mark van Assem wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> A new version of the WordNet draft can be found at [1] for 
>>> consideration for First Working Draft status at tomorrow's telecon.
>>>
>>> The main differences with the previous [2] draft are (a) new proposal 
>>> for URIs as discussed on the list; (b) all material on indirection 
>>> and versioning is moved to the Issues list.
>>>
>>> The RDF will be made available a.s.a.p. when the conversion program 
>>> has been adapted to the changes in the Draft and a service has been 
>>> set up at the W3C to serve CBD's for the WN URIs as described in the 
>>> Draft.
>>>
>>> With regards,
>>> Mark.
>>>
>>> [1]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wn-conversion-20062304
>>> [2]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wn-conversion-20060403
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>>  Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
>>        markREMOVE@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2006 22:24:15 UTC