- From: Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:09:43 -0400
- To: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@ontopia.net>
- Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org, public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org
Are you looking for syntax???? Perhaps it would be easier to understand if you did post a few examples of the kinds of alternatives you think there are. -Chris Dr. Christopher A. Welty, Knowledge Structures Group IBM Watson Research Center, 19 Skyline Dr., Hawthorne, NY 10532 USA Voice: +1 914.784.7055, IBM T/L: 863.7055, Fax: +1 914.784.7455 Email: welty@watson.ibm.com, Web: http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty/ Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@ontopia.net> Sent by: public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org 06/27/2005 10:00 AM To public-swbp-wg@w3.org cc Subject How to state simple facts in RDF In the work of the RDFTM task force the issue of how simple facts are represented in RDF has come up, since the task force needs to find a way to express such facts in RDF. It's probably not clear what I'm talking of here, but examples are statements like "this case is closed", "this company is bankrupt", "this article is a draft", and so on. How do people usually express this in RDF, and what is the "best" way? The task force thought of several alternatives, but would be interested to hear what the best practice is, if there is one, and what individuals think, if there is no best practice. -- Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian <URL: http://www.ontopia.net > GSM: +47 98 21 55 50 <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >
Received on Monday, 27 June 2005 19:09:51 UTC