- From: Valentina Presutti <presutti@cs.unibo.it>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:08:06 +0100
- To: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Dear Ralph, we do not plan any revisions to the document, so the "Status of this Document" section can be changed. I apologize, I didn't remind to tell something about that part. Thank you. Best regards, Valentina On Dec 12, 2005, at 9:45 PM, Ralph R. Swick wrote: > Valentina, are there any editorial remarks that should be added to > the Status of this Document section? Or should I only update the > third paragraph of that section to say that the Working Group does > not plan any further revisions to this document? > > At 10:58 AM 11/17/2005 +0100, Valentina Presutti wrote: > >> Dear Guus, >> >> exactly. The document didn't change since the last publication and we >> didn't have new comments after that. >> (I wasn't sure about what information were needed) >> >> So, the TF will wait for the Working Group to decide about the Note >> publication. >> >> Many thanks. >> >> Best regards, >> Valentina >> >> >> >>> Valentina, >>> >>> OK, you provided precisely the information I was looking. For a new >>> publication it is good practice to summarize the changes. So, here, >>> no comments since last publication, no changes, so a good reason to >>> go for a Working Group Note. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Guus >>> >>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> Ciao, >>>> Valentina >>>> On Nov 16, 2005, at 3:48 PM, Guus Schreiber wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Valentina Presutti wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>> the RDFTM Task Force would like to propose >>>>>> the "2005-03-29" W3C Working Group draft of the >>>>>> "A Survey of RDF/Topic Maps Interoperability Proposals" >>>>>> for W3C Public Note publication: >>>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdftm-survey/ > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2005 13:30:57 UTC