Barad team

We are proud to announce that Naqsh va Ideh Barad Consulting Engineers has successfully obtained the official Building Category Rank from the Plan and Budget Organization of Iran. This achievement underscores our commitment to excellence and adherence to the highest standards in engineering consultancy. We would like to express our gratitude to our dedicated team for their hard work and professionalism that made this milestone possible. As we move forward, we remain committed to delivering exceptional service in the field of building and urban design. #EngineeringExcellence #UrbanDesign #NaqshAndIdehBarad

⭐️ Meet Our Team ⭐️ We are proud to introduce Hosein Delavari a dedicated professional with a Master’s degree in Regional Planning from the University of Tehran. Hossein is not only knowledgeable but also kind, patient, and always eager to learn and collaborate. With several years of professional experience in regional planning, he has successfully implemented complex concepts in real-world projects. His ability to engage with others and his passion for continuous learning make him an invaluable team member and an excellent collaborator on group projects.

🌟 Meet Our Team 🌟 Meet romina pourakbar, our talented urban planner and urban design expert with a master's degree from the University of Tehran. She's one of our most passionate, intelligent, and quick-learning colleagues. We’re so proud to have her on our team! 💼✨

🌟 Meet Our Team 🌟 We're thrilled to introduce one of our amazing team members, Mahdieh Tangaki! 🌐 Architect & Urban Designer from the University of Tehran Mahdieh brings a wealth of knowledge and creativity to our projects, ensuring that every design is innovative and functional. We’re proud to have such a skilled and dedicated professional on our team!

🌟 Meet Our Team 🌟 We're thrilled to introduce one of our amazing team members, Mahdieh Tangaki! 🌐 Architect & Urban Designer from the University of Tehran Mahdieh brings a wealth of knowledge and creativity to our projects, ensuring that every design is innovative and functional. We’re proud to have such a skilled and dedicated professional on our team!

🌆 Comparing the Theories of Peter Calthorpe and Allan Jacobs in Urban Design 🌆 🌟 Peter Calthorpe (1980s-1990s): 1. 🛤 Transit-Oriented Design: Calthorpe emphasizes the close relationship between urban design and public transportation, particularly in shaping dense and accessible cities. 2. 🌿 Sustainable Development: He supports sustainable development through urban design, with a focus on conserving natural resources and reducing energy consumption. 3. 🏘 Diverse Neighborhoods: Calthorpe aims to create diverse residential neighborhoods with various housing types and social services. 🌟 Allan Jacobs (1970s-1980s): 1. 🌳 Livable Streets: Jacobs focuses on the importance of livable streets and public spaces, prioritizing the design of streets that people can utilize and enjoy. 2. 📊 Field Study: Jacobs seeks to enhance urban quality of life through detailed analysis of streets and public spaces. 3. 🎨 Diversity and Creativity in Design: Diversity and creativity in architectural forms and shapes are key features of Jacobs' theories. 🔻 Common Ground: 1. 👥 Human-Centric Approach: Both theorists emphasize the importance of human interaction within urban spaces. 2. 🚶♂️ Public Spaces: Both prioritize the design and enhancement of public spaces. 3. 🌆 Urban Quality of Life: They present their theories to improve daily urban life and create better living environments. 🔺 Theoretical Contrasts: 1. 🚄 Transportation Philosophy: Calthorpe focuses on public transportation and neighborhood connectivity, whereas Jacobs emphasizes designing attractive and livable streets. 2. 🌳 Open vs. Dense Spaces: Calthorpe favors creating dense and accessible cities, while Jacobs highlights the importance of open spaces and wider streets for social interaction. 3. 📏 Design Approach: Calthorpe employs a systematic and comprehensive planning approach, while Jacobs values field studies and real-life experiences to enhance urban design. Which approach do you think is more suitable for our cities? Share your thoughts in the comments! ✍️👇 --- #UrbanDesign #PeterCalthorpe #AllanJacobs #PublicSpaces #CityPlanning #Architecture

🌆 Comparing Jan Gehl and Leon Krier's Theories in Urban Design 🌆 🌟 Jan Gehl: 1. 🏃♂️ Pedestrian-Focused: Gehl promotes improving pedestrian spaces and enhancing urban life quality through walking and cycling. 2. 📊 Social Behavior Analysis: By conducting field studies and analyzing people's behaviors in public spaces, he aids in better design. 3. 🏙 Liveable Cities: Gehl seeks to create cities that are pleasant and practical for daily life, especially social and public spaces. 🌟 Leon Krier: 1. 🏛 Classic and Neo-Classical Design: Krier advocates for the revival of classical and neo-classical architectural styles, designing cities with a cultural and historical identity. 2. 🏘 Small and Neighborhood-Centric Development: He emphasizes the development of small, neighborhood-centered cities closer to the human scale. 3. 🏢 Critique of High-Rises: Krier strongly criticizes the construction of skyscrapers, deeming them inhuman and incompatible with urban life. 🔻 Common Approaches: 1. 🌇 Human Scale Focus: Both theorists stress the importance of human scale in urban design, analyzing daily living spaces from this perspective. 2. 👥 Social Interactions: Designing spaces that facilitate social interactions is a key goal for both Gehl and Krier. 3. 🌿 Public and Green Spaces: Attention to creating and improving public and green spaces is another shared aspect in their work. The insights and opinions of Jan Gehl and Leon Krier each approach the enhancement of urban life quality uniquely. Which do you prefer: living in a walkable, pedestrian-friendly city by Gehl, or in small, classical neighborhoods by Krier? Share your thoughts in the comments below! 👇 --- #UrbanDesign #JanGehl #LeonKrier #CityPlanning #PublicSpaces #HumanScale #PedestrianFriendly #ClassicalArchitecture

🌆 Comparison Between Donald Appleyard and William Whyte in Urban Design 🌆 🔹 Donald Appleyard: 1. 🌿 Environmental Perception and Quality of Life: Appleyard analyses how people perceive urban environments and their impact on quality of life using mental maps. 2. 🚧 Traffic and Urban Safety: He emphasizes that traffic density affects safety and the quality of public spaces, offering solutions to reduce traffic hazards and improve pedestrian safety. 3. 🗺 Mental Maps: Appleyard employs mental maps to better understand the spatial structure of cities and how people perceive different environments. 🔹 William Whyte: 1. 🏞 Public Space Analysis: Whyte focuses on observing public spaces to understand how people interact within these environments. 2. 🪑 Seating and Interaction Spaces: He highlights the importance of designing appropriate seating and social amenities to attract people and boost social activities in public spaces. 3. 🌆 Street Life: Whyte emphasizes the significance of vibrant street life and diverse activities that enliven and energize streets. 🔻 Common Approaches: 1. 📊 Research Approach: Appleyard focuses on environmental perception and mental maps, while Whyte uses social observations and field methods. 2. 🪩 Social Interactions: Whyte focuses more on designing spaces that facilitate social interactions, whereas Appleyard examines how people's perceptions of their environment influence their urban behavior. 3. 🎥 Research Methods: Whyte utilizes filming and live observations to analyze collective behaviors, while Appleyard uses mental maps and cognitive methods. Both pioneers, Donald Appleyard and William Whyte, have explored different dimensions of urban spaces with their unique methodologies and have provided solutions for enhancing urban life quality. 🌟 --- #UrbanDesign #DonaldAppleyard #WilliamWhyte #CityPlanning #PublicSpaces #TrafficSafety #SocialInteractions #MentalMaps #CityLife #UrbanInnovation #DesignConsultants

🌟 **Jacobs vs. Alexander: Leading Thinkers in Urban Planning** 🌟 🔸 **Jane Jacobs:** Jane Jacobs, with her writings, especially her famous book "The Death and Life of Great American Cities," had an undeniable impact on urban planning thoughts. She believed that vibrant and lively cities result from diverse land use and high residential density. Jacobs advocated for dynamic neighborhoods and believed that urban design should be bottom-up, with active community participation. 🔸 **Christopher Alexander:** Christopher Alexander offered a unique perspective on urban design by emphasizing complexity and natural patterns. He believed that cities should grow like living organisms, with their vitality emerging from intricate and interconnected networks. His book "A Pattern Language" helps designers create spaces that are fitting and harmonize with human needs. 🌍 **Different Views, Same Goal:** While Jacobs and Alexander followed different approaches in urban planning, they shared a common goal: creating better and more humane urban spaces. These two pioneers, with their knowledge and experience, aimed to create cities that better cater to their residents' needs – places where people can live, work, and commute comfortably. 💬 **Which Perspective Do You Find More Effective?** Are you a fan of Jane Jacobs' dense and diverse neighborhoods, or do you believe in Christopher Alexander's complexity and nature-inspired patterns? Share your thoughts with us! #UrbanDesign #JaneJacobs #ChristopherAlexander #CityPlanning #UrbanLiving #ModernCities #UrbanPlanning #CityArchitecture #UrbanLife

We walked on Jomhoori street in #tehran and picked up his issues. The present video is a part of the recorded images. The images contain physical information of the floor/furniture/wall and non-physical information including noise/activity and people's behavior. From these steps and impressions, maps of urban space qualities are extracted and based on that information, the #urban_design process begins.