AF Partners

Supreme Court Criticizes NGT's Revenue-Based Penalty for Environmental Damages The Supreme Court has expressed disapproval of a National Green Tribunal (NGT) order that imposed a Rs. 25 crore penalty on a company for environmental damages based on its revenue range of Rs. 100-500 crores. The Court highlighted three major flaws in the NGT's approach: <>The wide revenue range lacked precise figures. <> Revenue data was taken from the public domain without verification. <> Penalty was imposed without notifying the company. Key Observation: "In any case, the generation of revenue would have no nexus with the amount of penalty to be ascertained for environmental damages... With deep anguish, we have to say that the methodology adopted by the learned NGT for imposing penalty is totally unknown to the principles of law." The bench, comprising Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Viswanathan, set aside the order, emphasizing adherence to natural justice and proper legal procedures. CASE: BENZO CHEM INDUSTRIAL PRIVATE LIMITED v. ARVIND MANOHAR MAHAJAN & ORS. [CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 9202-9203/2022], Supreme Court of India. #EnviromentalLaw #SupremeCourt #NationalGreenTribunal

Saluting our brave hearts who fought for our freedom. Happy Independence Day!

The incorporation of Zero FIR and e-FIR in India's criminal laws modernizes the justice system. Zero FIR allows victims to file FIRs at any police station, ensuring swift access to legal recourse. e-FIR enables online filings, reducing the need for physical presence and cutting delays. These reforms enhance efficiency, responsiveness, and inclusivity, reflecting a commitment to victim centric justice. Their success depends on proper law enforcement training, public awareness, and robust accountability mechanisms. #BharatiyaNagarikSurakshaSanhita #CriminalLaw

"If the State or any prosecuting agency including the court concerned has no wherewithal to provide or protect the fundamental right of an accused to have a speedy trial as enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution then the State or any other prosecuting agency should not oppose the plea for bail on the ground that the crime committed is serious. Article 21 of the Constitution applies irrespective of the nature of the crime." The Hon'ble Apex Court's observation underscores the paramount importance of the right to a speedy trial as a fundamental right enshrined in Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. Article 21 guarantees the protection of life and personal liberty, and this includes the right to a fair and expeditious trial. The statement asserts that if the State or any prosecuting agency, including the court, is unable to ensure this right, they should not oppose bail solely on the grounds of the severity of the crime. This perspective emphasizes that the right to a speedy trial is fundamental and non-negotiable, regardless of the nature or seriousness of the offense. This interpretation aligns with the broader principles of justice and the protection of individual rights within the legal framework. Ensuring a speedy trial is not only a constitutional mandate but also a crucial aspect of maintaining public confidence in the legal system. - Case: JAVED GULAM NABI SHAIKH Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR [SLP(Crl) No. 3809/2024] #SupremCourtOfIndia #CriminalLaw #FundamentalRight

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court correctly orders to pay Rs 50 lakh in damages for defamatory tweets. The unchecked spread of misinformation on Twitter (thread) highlights a significant issue with social media platforms. When false or harmful content circulates widely and rapidly, it can have serious repercussions, influencing public opinion and potentially causing harm. This underscores the need for better moderation and accountability measures on these platforms to prevent the spread of misinformation and protect the integrity of information shared online. Case bearing no.CS(OS) 300/2021, Delhi High Court. #DelhihighCourt #Defamation

The Supreme Court's decision to condemn the practice of lawyers suppressing material facts in Special Leave Petitions is a significant step toward maintaining transparency and integrity within the judicial process. By imposing a fine of Rs. 25,000 on the petitioners, the Apex Court has underscored the seriousness of this issue and the necessity for stringent measures to deter such behavior. This ruling came from the vacation bench of Justices AS Oka and Rajesh Bindal, who were addressing a challenge by the All India EPF Staff Federation against a interim order from the Delhi High Court. The petitioners' primary grievance was the lack of interim relief and the subsequent adjournment of their case to September. The Supreme Court's firm stance in this matter highlights its commitment to ensuring that the judicial process is not undermined by the concealment of crucial information, thus promoting fairness and accountability in legal proceedings. CASE: ALL INDIA EPF STAFF FEDERATION VS. UNION OF INDIA [SLP(C) No. 013329 - 013330 / 2024] #SupremeCourtOfIndia #DelhiHighCourt #ProfessionalEthics

#polltime #itcompany #techcompanies #intellectualpropertylaw #companylaw

How To Become A Good Lawyer? 10 Tips From Fali S Nariman #FaliNariman

#quiztime

#quiztime