https://github.com/screen-share/element-capture/blob/main/README.md
https://screen-share.github.io/element-capture
API for capturing a subtree of the DOM.
Given a video MediaStreamTrack obtained through pre-existing means to initiate tab-capture, Element Capture allows mutating the track to only capture a subtree of the DOM starting at a given Element.
The API bears some resemblance to the Region Capture API, but affords greater flexibility for applications, because occluding and occluded content are both excluded from the capture.
We are holding off on the request for a TAG review until we get some more developer feedback about the API shape.
Pending
Gecko: Under consideration (https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/857)
WebKit: No signal (https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/280)
Web developers:
Positive See upvotes and comments on the following:
Other signals:
Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
* Solicit more informed Web developer feedback to validate the API shape.
* Ensure that the feature works correctly in conjunction with adjacent features.
No changes to DevTools are intended.
No
This API is supported on all desktop platforms. Mobile platforms are unsupported because screen-capture itself is unsupported on those platforms.
Not yet (but we’re working on extending coverage)
element-capture
ElementCapture
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1418194
https://launch.corp.google.com/launch/4240472
https://chromestatus.com/feature/5198989277790208
Intent to prototype: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAMO6jDO6y5b6y3q9QEd2scsYPWuWLJBnPLgwm%2BaHpKx36CYMwA%40mail.gmail.com
This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status.
Hi Elad,
Can you clarify which milestones you intend to experiment in?
thanks,
Mike
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAMO6jDN8mcO%2BYqaVA5nb5BBv-dZB0wqwfh9580wMc-e%2BNuP7yw%40mail.gmail.com.
Thanks, LGTM to experiment from 121 to 126 inclusive.
Hello Blink owners,
We are asking for a breaking period of 3 weeks to this API, followed by a renewed experiment for the traditional 6 milestones (2024-May-14 to 2024-Jun-04). A request that seems similar to me was granted in January 2022 for another API, and later shipped successfully with consensus with Mozilla and Apple.
At the time of writing, we have public support for this API from such companies as Zoom, Jitsi, Mux, DialPad, Whereby, Intel and Tella. Tango’s co-founder wrote “I can't emphasize enough how instrumental this specification would be for our product and user experience.” However, none of them have signed up for the OT as of yet.
From the OT perspective:
This API allows Web developers to build novel new features; however, it requires a non-trivial investment. We are hoping that after giving more time, we will see more participation.
From the standardization perspective:
We need time to pick up discussions with Mozilla and Apple again. As Chrome’s Security and Privacy experts do not share the concerns Mozilla and Apple have previously voiced, it stands to reason that additional discussions will allow us to converge - and we will prioritize these discussions now.
Additionally, some possibilities remain for API changes that could perhaps allow for a compromise, mostly around cross-origin isolation. (Full disclosure - this is not my ideal outcome, but it’s a fallback possibility worth mentioning.)
Progress made:
Spec: The spec has evolved and is now more mature, dealing better with such edge cases as loss of “eligibility for restriction.”
TAG: Previously we held off on the request for a TAG review until we got some more developer feedback about the API shape. Having received this initial feedback, the TAG request has now been submitted.
Signals: Signals have been requested. Mozilla responded. We intend to prioritize this discussion with them now.
Feedback: Outreach for feedback from the spec community - multiple issues were filed on the spec by Web developers.
WPT: Coverage has recently been extended.
Reasons to run a new trial:
Gain additional feedback from new participants. Examples for remaining areas where new feedback could help include:
Uncover new edge cases which were not uncovered by the spec authors and reviewers, implementers and current OT participants. The current edge cases here demonstrate how non-obvious these may be.
Validate (or refute) the assumptions we have made about the viability of an MVP that is missing some functionality. Examples:
Events notifying apps when an element stops/starts being “eligible for restriction”.
Mechanism to force elements into an “eligible for restriction” state.
Encourage future OT participation by Web developers, by demonstrating that risks associated with relying on an origin trial, while real, are partially offset by a commitment to keep the OT going until discussions conclude.
Thanks,
Elad
Note: Because you're asking for a renewal of 6 milestones, this will require 3 LGTMs.
Can you clarify which milestones you're asking for? You've
written "(2024-May-14 to 2024-Jun-04)" - that range maps to M125
and M126 stable releases.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/073738e4-cb2f-4a1a-9299-cf134f971a67n%40chromium.org.
OK - thanks for the clarification. I would ask that you get in touch with every registered origin - expiring the experiment early may be surprising.
LGTM1 to experiment from M127 to M132 inclusive.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/45e6f481-db05-48d4-8da9-92b5b05e6447%40chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw_z5FbVXB-8OLe0O_q7nV9qgaOsrCyio1HcuWCVD9v8CQ%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/9cfa01b4-a346-4b13-8d36-35b03d7875ben%40chromium.org.
Hi all,The latest configuration (v1.0.0.17) to re-enable the feature went out last week. Could you go to chrome://components/ and check the version of the Origin Trials component and report back what you see?Users will need to restart their browser after getting the latest version.Best,James