-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Larger cap for lookupSecurity maximum results #375
Comments
Sure -- can you recompile and try that it actually works with larger requests, i.e. that the backend doesn't just say 'no thanks' ? |
Hi Dirk, thanks for the speedy reply. I'll try that. In BBG it states the list if a couple thousand lines long but you can only export 250 at a time. I don't want to manually go through that process. |
It sounds reasonable -- the result fields for this, as I recall, are small-ish so we may as well consume 10k or more, and as I recall for some classes (corportate bonds, say) there could indeed be a bazillion results. But I switched jobs and industries and don't currently have access to the backend so I have to rely on you (or @johnlaing). |
I'm not sure I understand. Can you provide an example of something you're trying to do that doesn't work? |
seems like a bloomberg server side limit response <- Rblpapi::lookupSecurity('a', maxResults = 1001)
nrow(response) # 1000 Verbose print out shows processing of only 1 single Response event, ie no partial responses. Hence, probably Bloomberg server side limitation. To fully put this to bed, probably will have to print out what events we are getting back other than Response and Partial Response, as we are currently just silently ignoring them. However, I couldn't be bothered. |
I tried the recompile. Still capped at 1000 lines. |
So looks like it is the backend as @klin333 reminded us. So sadly I think we can close this here as there is little we can do. |
I guess we could warn if |
Currently it looks like lookupSecurity is capped at a max of 1000 results, can we increase that number?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: