Vous êtes confronté à des déséquilibres de pouvoir dans une discussion de groupe. Comment gérez-vous efficacement les fortes personnalités ?
Plongez dans la dynamique des discussions de groupe ! Partagez vos stratégies pour équilibrer la conversation lorsque les fortes personnalités dominent.
Vous êtes confronté à des déséquilibres de pouvoir dans une discussion de groupe. Comment gérez-vous efficacement les fortes personnalités ?
Plongez dans la dynamique des discussions de groupe ! Partagez vos stratégies pour équilibrer la conversation lorsque les fortes personnalités dominent.
-
Set clear ground rules for respectful interaction early on. Actively guide the conversation by asking for input from quieter participants, preventing any one person from dominating. Acknowledge strong personalities’ contributions briefly, then reframe to include others. Use breakout groups if needed, allowing for more balanced participation in smaller settings. My personal favourite is to use a lit match stick or an hourglass to time speakers. Once the match burns out, or the sand is up, your airtime ends as well.
-
Do rounds of each person talking with NO interruption in response to a key question formulated by the group. Each person is listened to by the others and it is timed. Once you have completed a round I , go again. It is powerful.
-
1. Using phenomenological approach to call out behaviours. Never ‘assume’ you know what is really going on, instead present what you observe and sense check? 2. Ensure you create a clear ‘working together contract’, stick to it and keep others to it? 3. Bring in a trained facilitator if facilitating group dynamics and/or conflict is not your skill set?
-
To address power imbalances in group discussions, I prioritize creating a safe, inclusive environment where every voice is valued. I start by setting ground rules that promote respect and equal speaking time. When strong personalities dominate, I gently redirect the conversation, inviting quieter members to share their thoughts. Techniques like round-robin sharing or using a "talking stick" ensure everyone has a chance to speak. I watch for non-verbal cues and encourage hesitant participants to contribute. If necessary, I have private conversations with dominant individuals to raise awareness of their impact. I strive to foster a collaborative atmosphere where diverse perspectives lead to richer discussions and better outcomes for all.
-
I will always find a way to ask the strong personalities to give the less dominant people a chance to speak, however, the *way* I ask them to do that will depend on the group and the people. Recently, I had this in a session where the really experienced members of staff were chipping in answers to every question, and the less established staff stayed quiet. So I asked a question and then said "lets hear from the newer members of staff for this one" (we had already discussed levels of experience in the room earlier). However, there were other times I diverted back to the more experienced members of staff and asked them to help those with less experience in small group activities. I still wanted them to feel valued too!
-
Keep everyone focused on the larger objective, ensure that everyone's voice is heard and ask incisive questions politely so that agenda gets pushed aggressively and prematurely on others.
-
ask input from quiter participants and remind them about the group of especially the one of we all tak part in participating
Notez cet article
Lecture plus pertinente
-
Animation de grands groupesQuelle est la clé d’une discussion respectueuse et productive en grand groupe?
-
Animation de grands groupesVous êtes au milieu d’une discussion de groupe animée. Comment désamorcer les tensions et favoriser un dialogue productif ?
-
Leadership interpersonnelComment favoriser la confiance et le respect dans une conversation difficile?
-
Prise de décisionVous êtes confronté à des décisions difficiles dans une conversation. Comment pouvez-vous les gérer efficacement ?