Miguel Fernández-Cejas

President Joe Biden signed the package Wednesday https://lnkd.in/gpgZEzQz A look at what’s in the $95 billion package passed by the Senate on Tuesday that will provide military aid to Ukraine and Israel, replenish U.S. weapons systems and give humanitarian assistance to civilians in Gaza. “It’s going to make America safer. It’s going to make the world safer,” Biden said, in remarks delivered from the White House, shortly after signing the legislation. The broad spending breakdown: -About $61 billion for Ukraine and replenishing U.S. weapons stockpiles. The overall amount provided to Ukraine for the purchase of weapons would be $13.8 billion. Ukraine would receive more than $9 billion of economic assistance in the form of “forgivable loans.” — About $26 billion for supporting Israel and providing humanitarian relief for people in Gaza. About $4 billion of that would be dedicated to replenishing Israel’s missile defense systems. More than $9 billion of the total would go toward humanitarian assistance in Gaza amid the Israel-Hamas war. — About $8 billion for helping U.S. allies in the Indo-Pacific region and countering China. More than $3.3 billion would go toward submarine infrastructure and development, with an additional $1.9 billion to replenish U.S. weapons provided to Taiwan and other regional allies. #Biden signs $95B #foreign aid bill with #TikTok provision

Canada Marine Protection Plan Aims To Serve As Global Model

One day your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it’s worth watching. 🎥 – Gerard Way Isn't that quote just electrifying? It's like the ultimate movie trailer for a script you’re still writing! But let's unpack this: How do you ensure your life is a blockbuster hit worth the watch? From an entrepreneurial perspective, life's worth goes beyond the zeros in your bank account or daily grind posts. 🚀 It's about taking bold risks and making those wild dreams a reality. Picture your life's film showcasing scenes of daring leaps, transforming failures into wins, and creating something impactful. You don’t need to be Elon Musk; you just need to be the best *you*. So go disrupt something—in a positive way, of course! Now, onto relationships. No epic movie shines with just one star. 🤷‍♂️ Whether it's family, friends, or even that barista who knows your order by heart, these people add rich hues to your narrative. Cherish them, enjoy their company, and share both laughs and tears. Surround yourself with those who uplift and challenge you, loving you despite your dad dance moves at weddings. 🕺💃 They are the supporting characters giving your story depth and soul. Lastly, prioritize pure joy and self-care. Sure, business goals and meaningful contributions matter. But what's the point if you're not reveling in the journey? Amidst all your hustling, steal moments that make you feel alive—whether it’s a whimsical road trip, picking up a therapeutic hobby like pottery, or getting lost in a good book. Your mental and physical well-being deserve golden-hour scenes. ✨ So, when that cinematic rewind happens, ensure you've got Oscar-worthy highlights. Build your dream, cherish your people, and never forget to find joy in the simplest things. 🎬 Life isn’t just worth watching—it’s worth making unforgettable.

Requires reading and reposting 🇺🇸

**Is the fight against misinformation in Australia taking a step back?** In a surprising move, Australia’s government has decided to withdraw a controversial bill aimed at combating misinformation online. Initially proposed by the Labor government, this legislation sought to impose hefty fines—up to 5% of global revenue—on tech giants that failed to control false information spreading on their platforms. This decision has ignited conversations about the balance between regulating online content and protecting freedom of speech. Supporters of the bill argued that stricter measures were necessary in an age where misinformation can have severe consequences, directly influencing public opinion and even election outcomes. These advocates believed that empowering the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) with enforceable rules would significantly mitigate misleading narratives and improve accountability among major digital platforms. However, critics raised concerns about potential overreach and censorship, suggesting such regulations might infringe on users' rights to free expression. They questioned whether imposing fines could lead companies to err on the side of caution, potentially stifling legitimate discourse while only making minor dents in truly harmful disinformation. By retracting this bill, Australia seems poised at a crossroads: How will they navigate future legislation addressing misinformation without clashing with fundamental rights? What alternative strategies might be more effective? The conversation isn't over; it’s evolving. Share your thoughts! Do you think regulation is necessary or do we risk losing essential freedoms if we push too hard? Connect with startups to drive your corporate innovation 🚀 Book a meeting! https://lnkd.in/dFYwmbHq #Misinformation #Australia #TechRegulation #FreedomOfSpeech #DigitalPlatforms #Accountability #PublicOpinion #GovernmentPolicy #DigitalRights #InnovationInTech Read more here: https://lnkd.in/dZcWqFP7

**Is the fight against misinformation in Australia taking a step back?** In a surprising move, Australia’s government has decided to withdraw a controversial bill aimed at combating misinformation online. Initially proposed by the Labor government, this legislation sought to impose hefty fines—up to 5% of global revenue—on tech giants that failed to control false information spreading on their platforms. This decision has ignited conversations about the balance between regulating online content and protecting freedom of speech. Supporters of the bill argued that stricter measures were necessary in an age where misinformation can have severe consequences, directly influencing public opinion and even election outcomes. These advocates believed that empowering the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) with enforceable rules would significantly mitigate misleading narratives and improve accountability among major digital platforms. However, critics raised concerns about potential overreach and censorship, suggesting such regulations might infringe on users' rights to free expression. They questioned whether imposing fines could lead companies to err on the side of caution, potentially stifling legitimate discourse while only making minor dents in truly harmful disinformation. By retracting this bill, Australia seems poised at a crossroads: How will they navigate future legislation addressing misinformation without clashing with fundamental rights? What alternative strategies might be more effective? The conversation isn't over; it’s evolving. Share your thoughts! Do you think regulation is necessary or do we risk losing essential freedoms if we push too hard? Connect with startups to drive your corporate innovation 🚀 Book a meeting! https://lnkd.in/dFYwmbHq #Misinformation #Australia #TechRegulation #FreedomOfSpeech #DigitalPlatforms #Accountability #PublicOpinion #GovernmentPolicy #DigitalRights #InnovationInTech Read more here: https://lnkd.in/dZcWqFP7

**Is the fight against misinformation in Australia taking a step back?** In a surprising move, Australia’s government has decided to withdraw a controversial bill aimed at combating misinformation online. Initially proposed by the Labor government, this legislation sought to impose hefty fines—up to 5% of global revenue—on tech giants that failed to control false information spreading on their platforms. This decision has ignited conversations about the balance between regulating online content and protecting freedom of speech. Supporters of the bill argued that stricter measures were necessary in an age where misinformation can have severe consequences, directly influencing public opinion and even election outcomes. These advocates believed that empowering the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) with enforceable rules would significantly mitigate misleading narratives and improve accountability among major digital platforms. However, critics raised concerns about potential overreach and censorship, suggesting such regulations might infringe on users' rights to free expression. They questioned whether imposing fines could lead companies to err on the side of caution, potentially stifling legitimate discourse while only making minor dents in truly harmful disinformation. By retracting this bill, Australia seems poised at a crossroads: How will they navigate future legislation addressing misinformation without clashing with fundamental rights? What alternative strategies might be more effective? The conversation isn't over; it’s evolving. Share your thoughts! Do you think regulation is necessary or do we risk losing essential freedoms if we push too hard? Connect with startups to drive your corporate innovation 🚀 Book a meeting! https://lnkd.in/dTxGsKrN #Misinformation #Australia #TechRegulation #FreedomOfSpeech #DigitalPlatforms #Accountability #PublicOpinion #GovernmentPolicy #DigitalRights #InnovationInTech Read more here: https://lnkd.in/dvw5kNah

**Is the fight against misinformation in Australia taking a step back?** In a surprising move, Australia’s government has decided to withdraw a controversial bill aimed at combating misinformation online. Initially proposed by the Labor government, this legislation sought to impose hefty fines—up to 5% of global revenue—on tech giants that failed to control false information spreading on their platforms. This decision has ignited conversations about the balance between regulating online content and protecting freedom of speech. Supporters of the bill argued that stricter measures were necessary in an age where misinformation can have severe consequences, directly influencing public opinion and even election outcomes. These advocates believed that empowering the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) with enforceable rules would significantly mitigate misleading narratives and improve accountability among major digital platforms. However, critics raised concerns about potential overreach and censorship, suggesting such regulations might infringe on users' rights to free expression. They questioned whether imposing fines could lead companies to err on the side of caution, potentially stifling legitimate discourse while only making minor dents in truly harmful disinformation. By retracting this bill, Australia seems poised at a crossroads: How will they navigate future legislation addressing misinformation without clashing with fundamental rights? What alternative strategies might be more effective? The conversation isn't over; it’s evolving. Share your thoughts! Do you think regulation is necessary or do we risk losing essential freedoms if we push too hard? Connect with startups to drive your corporate innovation 🚀 Book a meeting! https://lnkd.in/dFYwmbHq #Misinformation #Australia #TechRegulation #FreedomOfSpeech #DigitalPlatforms #Accountability #PublicOpinion #GovernmentPolicy #DigitalRights #InnovationInTech Read more here: https://lnkd.in/dZcWqFP7

**Is the fight against misinformation in Australia taking a step back?** In a surprising move, Australia’s government has decided to withdraw a controversial bill aimed at combating misinformation online. Initially proposed by the Labor government, this legislation sought to impose hefty fines—up to 5% of global revenue—on tech giants that failed to control false information spreading on their platforms. This decision has ignited conversations about the balance between regulating online content and protecting freedom of speech. Supporters of the bill argued that stricter measures were necessary in an age where misinformation can have severe consequences, directly influencing public opinion and even election outcomes. These advocates believed that empowering the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) with enforceable rules would significantly mitigate misleading narratives and improve accountability among major digital platforms. However, critics raised concerns about potential overreach and censorship, suggesting such regulations might infringe on users' rights to free expression. They questioned whether imposing fines could lead companies to err on the side of caution, potentially stifling legitimate discourse while only making minor dents in truly harmful disinformation. By retracting this bill, Australia seems poised at a crossroads: How will they navigate future legislation addressing misinformation without clashing with fundamental rights? What alternative strategies might be more effective? The conversation isn't over; it’s evolving. Share your thoughts! Do you think regulation is necessary or do we risk losing essential freedoms if we push too hard? Connect with startups to drive your corporate innovation 🚀 Book a meeting! https://lnkd.in/dFYwmbHq #Misinformation #Australia #TechRegulation #FreedomOfSpeech #DigitalPlatforms #Accountability #PublicOpinion #GovernmentPolicy #DigitalRights #InnovationInTech Read more here: https://lnkd.in/dZcWqFP7

**Is the fight against misinformation in Australia taking a step back?** In a surprising move, Australia’s government has decided to withdraw a controversial bill aimed at combating misinformation online. Initially proposed by the Labor government, this legislation sought to impose hefty fines—up to 5% of global revenue—on tech giants that failed to control false information spreading on their platforms. This decision has ignited conversations about the balance between regulating online content and protecting freedom of speech. Supporters of the bill argued that stricter measures were necessary in an age where misinformation can have severe consequences, directly influencing public opinion and even election outcomes. These advocates believed that empowering the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) with enforceable rules would significantly mitigate misleading narratives and improve accountability among major digital platforms. However, critics raised concerns about potential overreach and censorship, suggesting such regulations might infringe on users' rights to free expression. They questioned whether imposing fines could lead companies to err on the side of caution, potentially stifling legitimate discourse while only making minor dents in truly harmful disinformation. By retracting this bill, Australia seems poised at a crossroads: How will they navigate future legislation addressing misinformation without clashing with fundamental rights? What alternative strategies might be more effective? The conversation isn't over; it’s evolving. Share your thoughts! Do you think regulation is necessary or do we risk losing essential freedoms if we push too hard? Connect with startups to drive your corporate innovation 🚀 Book a meeting! https://lnkd.in/dFYwmbHq #Misinformation #Australia #TechRegulation #FreedomOfSpeech #DigitalPlatforms #Accountability #PublicOpinion #GovernmentPolicy #DigitalRights #InnovationInTech Read more here: https://lnkd.in/dZcWqFP7

Bull Sheet PNG SVG, Bull Spooky png, Bull Ghost png, Funny Halloween png, Halloween farm png, Western Cow png, Halloween Cow png, Funny Cow https://lnkd.in/edwtE5Zu

Security Withdrawn from Ex-CM Champai Soren, Claims Conspiracy https://lnkd.in/gmYSSDxf BJP leader accuses Hemant Soren govt of political plot over security recall Key Points: • Former Jharkhand CM Champai Soren alleges security vehicles withdrawn • Accuses JMM-led government of political conspiracy against him • Soren’s Z-Plus security significantly reduced since joining BJP RANCHI – Former Jharkhand Chief Minister Champai Soren has accused the current state government of withdrawing vehicles assigned for his security. The BJP leader claims this action disregards established rules and protocols. Moreover, Champai Soren alleges a political conspiracy by the JMM-led government against him. He shared his concerns on the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. "I don’t need security among my people in Jharkhand," Soren stated defiantly. However, he emphasized that the public would respond to this perceived political plot. The former CM directly accused Chief Minister Hemant Soren of orchestrating the conspiracy. Furthermore, Champai Soren’s security has seen significant reductions since he joined the BJP. Despite holding Z-Plus security due to his former position, his protection has been scaled back. In addition, the government had previously withdrawn security personnel assigned to him. Now, they have allegedly taken away the vehicles as well. On the other hand, Champai Soren remains confident in public support. He has called on citizens to stand against what he views as political maneuvering. Meanwhile, the state government has not yet responded to these serious allegations. The post Security Withdrawn from Ex-CM Champai Soren, Claims Conspiracy appeared first on Town Post. https://lnkd.in/g4A5f6VR