Skip to main content
Log in

Component allocation and ordering policy in a multi-component, multi-product assembled to stock system

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
OR Spectrum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers a two-echelon assembled-to-stock system, consisting of several components and products, where a periodic review policy is used. Some components are common to several products. We propose a component allocation policy that attempts to minimize the total cost which consists of the holding cost and the shortage cost. This policy takes advantage of the sharing of common components. We use simulation, infinitesimal perturbation analysis and steepest descent algorithm to find the components’ order-up-to levels for the proposed policy and then compare its effectiveness with two policies that do not allow the sharing of common components. For the scenarios that we have run, the numerical results show that the proposed policy gives the lowest total cost. In addition, we have show the benefits of risk pooling from common component sharing and the echelon effect under different range of parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal N, Cohen MA (2001) Optimal material control in an assembly system with component commonality. Nav Res Logistics 48: 409–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker KR, Magazine MJ, Nuttle HLW (1986) The effect of commonality on safety stock in a simple inventory model. Manage Sci 32(8): 982–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollapragada S, Akella R, Srinivasan R (1998) Centralized ordering policies and allocation policies in a two echelon system with non-identical warehouses. Eur J Oper Res 106(1): 74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassandras CG (1993) Discrete event systems: modeling and performance analysis. Homewood, Ill: Aksen: Irwin

  • Chew EP, Lee LH, Lau YL (2006) Component commonality in assembled to stock systems. IIE Trans 38(3): 239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Kok TG, Fransoo JC (2003) Planning supply chain operations: definition and comparison of planning concepts. In: de Kok AG, Graves SC (eds) Supply chain management: design, coordination and operation. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppen G, Schrage L (1981) Centralized ordering policies in a multi-warehouse system with lead times and random demand. In: Schwarz LB (eds) Multi-level production/inventory systems: theory and practice. North-Holland, New York, pp 51–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Eynan A (1996) The impact of demands correlation on the effectiveness of component commonality. Int J Prod Res 34(6): 1581–1602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eynan A, Rosenblatt MJ (1996) Component commonality effects on inventory costs. IIE Trans 28: 93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu M (2002) Optimization for simulation: theory vs. practice. INFORMS J Comput 14(3): 192–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallien J, Wein LM (2003) A simple and effective component procurement policy for stochastic assembly systems. Queueing Syst 38(2): 221–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavirneni S, Kapuscinski R, Tayur S (1999) A simple and effective component procurement policy for stochastic assembly systems. Manage Sci 45(1): 16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerchak Y, Henig M (1986) An inventory model with component commonality. Oper Res Lett 5(3): 157–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerchak Y, Henig M (1989) Component commonality in assemble-to-order systems: models and properties. Naval Research Logistics 36: 61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerchak Y, Magazine MJ, Gamble AB (1988) Component commonality with service level requirements. Manage Sci 34(6): 753–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grotzinger SJ, Srinivasan R, Akella R, Bollapragada S (1993) Component procurement and allocation for products assembled to forecast: risk-pooling effects. IBM J Res Dev 37(4): 523–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier MS (1999) Component commonality in a multiple-period inventory model with service level constraints. Int J Prod Res 37(12): 2265–2683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho YC, Cao XR (1992) Perturbation analysis of discrete event dynamic systems. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Song J-S, Yao DD (2003) Order fill rate, leadtime variability, and advance demand information in an assemble-to-order system. Oper Res 51(2): 292–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir D, Yucesan E, Herer YT (2006) Multi-location transshipment problem with capacitated transportation. Eur J Oper Res 175(1): 602–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tayur S (1995) Computing optimal stock levels for common components in an assembly system, Working Paper, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, USA

  • Rosling K (1989) Optimal inventory policies for assembly systems under random demands. Oper Res 37(4): 565–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudi N (2000) Optimal inventory level in systems with common components, Working Paper, The Simon School, University of Rochester, Rochester

  • Zhao Y, Melamed B (2007) IPA derivatives for make-to-stock production-inventory systems with lost sales. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 52(8): 1491–1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. P. Chew.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chew, E.P., Lee, L.H. & Lau, Y.L. Component allocation and ordering policy in a multi-component, multi-product assembled to stock system. OR Spectrum 32, 293–317 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-009-0166-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-009-0166-7

Keywords

Navigation