Abstract
Smart home technology has the potential to support several tasks in the home, especially for older adults who are likely to increasingly experience difficulties with everyday activities. Trade-offs between privacy and autonomy, security, and comfort have been an ongoing discussion for over a decade. Although there have been significant advances in the technology available today compared to a few years ago, privacy communications to users accompanying these technologies have changed little. Much existing research in the smart home technology space focuses on the design of the technology itself; less has been done to ensure that older adults know where their data is going so that adoption of the technology is better informed, and so they feel more secure about using it. In this work a total of 30 documentations including 24 privacy policies of individual smart devices and 6 privacy terms and policies from platform providers were reviewed to understand their commonalities and shared limitations. Our evaluation revealed that the length of each ranged between 9 to 49 pages, and that such policies are rarely displayed to maximize user access and legibility, contributing to user confusion and concern. The results suggest a need for user agreements and privacy policies to be more easily accessible. Companies publishing privacy documents should be more mindful of how these are presented to the user, whether online or printed. This study recommends that companies should adhere to usability and readability guidelines and follow accessibility standards published by the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. For older adults to successfully utilize smart home technology, adoption should happen in an informed manner. Sustained usage may also be encouraged with practices that make users feel confident and in control of their data. It is important that companies build their trust ethically, and ensure that older adults are not required to trade off their privacy for autonomy and security.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Mozilla Foundation. Privacy Not Included: https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/privacynotincluded/.
- 2.
World Wide Web Consortium. (2018). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/.
References
Anderson, M., Perrin, A.: Tech Adoption Climbs among Older Adults. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Pew Research Center (2020). https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2017/05/17/tech-adoption-climbs-among-older-adults/
Anderson, M., Perrin, A.: 2. barriers to adoption and attitudes towards technology. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. (2019). https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2017/05/17/barriers-to-adoption-and-attitudes-towards-technology/. Retrieved 18 Sept 2022
Beaudin, J., Intille, S., Morris, M.: To track or not to track: user reactions to concepts in longitudinal health monitoring. J. Med. Internet Res. 8, e29 (2006)
Cahill, J., McLoughlin, S., O’Connor M., Stolberg, M., Wetherall, S.: Addressing issues of need, adaptability, user acceptability and ethics in the participatory design of new technology enabling wellness, independence and dignity for seniors living in residential homes. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population, pp. 90–109. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58530-7_7
Coughlin, J., D’Ambrosio, L., Reimer, B., Pratt, M.: Older adult perceptions of smart home technologies: implications for research, policy & market innovations in healthcare. In: Proceedings of 29th Annual International Conference on IEEEEMBS, pp. 1810–1815 (2007)
Courtney, K.: Privacy and senior willingness to adopt smart home information technology in residential care facilities. Methods Inf. Med. 47, 76–81 (2008)
Courtney, K., Demiris, G., Rantz, M., Skubic, M.: Needing smart home technologies: the perspectives of older adults in continuing care retirement communities. Inform. Primary Care 16, 195–201 (2008). https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v16i3.694
Demiris, G., Hensel, B.K., Skubic, M., Rantz, M.: Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 24, 120–124 (2008)
Demiris, G., et al.: Older adults’ attitudes towards and perceptions of “smart home” technologies: a pilot study. Med. Inform. Internet Med. 29, 87–94 (2004)
Mihailidis, A., Cockburn, A., Longley, C., Boger, J.: The acceptability of home monitoring technology among community-dwelling older adults and baby boomers. Assist. Technol. 20, 1–12 (2008). Spring
Mozilla Foundation. Privacy Not Included (n.d.). https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/privacynotincluded/. Retrieved 10 Sept 2021
Pal, D., Funilkul, S., Vanijja, V., Borworn, P.B.: Analyzing the elderly users’ adoption of smart-home services. IEEE Access 6, 51238–51252 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2869599
Pew Research Center. Americans and Privacy: Concerned, Confused and Feeling Lack of Control Over Their Personal Information (2019). https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/11/15/americans-attitudes-and-experiences-with-privacy-policies-and-laws/. Accessed 23 Sept 2022
Pirzada, P., Wilde, A., Doherty, G., Harris-Birtill, D.: Ethics and acceptance of smart homes for older adults. Inform. Health Soc. Care 47(1), 10–37 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2021.1923500
Portet, F., Vacher, M., Golanski, C., Roux, C., Meillon, B.: Design and evaluation of a smart home voice interface for the elderly – acceptability and objection aspects. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 17(1), 127–144 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0470-5
Steele, R., Secombe, C., Brookes, W.: Using wireless sensor networks for aged care: the patient’s perspective. In: Proceedings of Pervasive Health Conference and Workshops, pp. 1–10 (2006)
Sunyoung, K.: Exploring How Older Adults Use a Smart Speaker-Based Voice Assistant in Their First Interactions: Qualitative Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. JMIR Publications (2021). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7840274/
Townsend, D., Knoefel, F., Goubran, R.: Privacy versus autonomy: a tradeoff model for smart home monitoring technologies. In: 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 4749–4752 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091176
Tyrer, H., et al.: Technology for successful aging. In: Proceedings of 28th Annual International Conference on IEEE-EMBS, pp. 3290–3293 (2006)
United Nations. World population prospects 2019: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/423). Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019). https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2019_Highlights.pdf
Wild, K., Boise, L., Lundell, J., Foucek, A.: Unobtrusive in-home monitoring of cognitive and physical health: reactions and perceptions of older adults. J. Appl. Gerontol. 27, 181–200 (2008)
World Wide Web Consortium. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 (2018). https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/. Retrieved 10 Sept 2021
Acknowledgements
This study was supported in part by the MIT AgeLab’s C3 Connected Home Logistics Consortium.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vaidya, M., Lee, C., D’Ambrosio, L., Coughlin, J.F. (2023). Evaluating Privacy Policies and User Agreements of Smart Home Devices from the Perspective of the Aging Population. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S., Salvendy, G. (eds) HCI International 2023 Posters. HCII 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1833. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35992-7_70
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35992-7_70
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35991-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35992-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)