| Summary: | app-office/openoffice-2.3.0: Editing embedded tables (OLE ojects) corruptes them | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Jannick Kuhr <jakuhrlinux> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Office Team <office> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: |
A simple test file to reproduce the issue.
Screenshot - before Screenshot - after Fix for this issue |
||
|
Description
Jannick Kuhr
2007-09-20 20:01:10 UTC
Created attachment 131447 [details]
A simple test file to reproduce the issue.
Created attachment 131453 [details]
Screenshot - before
Created attachment 131455 [details]
Screenshot - after
The big black bar in the frame is just the border of one huge cell...
Please provide your output of "emerge info". Besides that: Works perfectly fine here with your test file (on x86), so either it's an AMD 64-issue or a problem with CFLAGS overoptimization, openoffice is very sensitive to those things I investigated further and it seems to be an 64bit issue. (Correction my Kubuntu installation is 32bit). I installed the 64bit edition of openSUSE (latest RC1) and had exactly the same problems. So I installed on this 64bit platform a 32bit build (also an ooo-build edition) of openoffice and the problem disappears. So I think this is a 64bit issue and not a problem of Gentoo. I thank you very much for your quick response and generally for your work on openoffice on Gentoo. I am creating an upstream bug report atm. Upstream bug for this issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81815 I have exactly the same results on my amd64 with app-office/openoffice-2.2.1. This issue has now been fixed upstream and the proposed patch works for me. Unfortunately the CWS which contains the patch is targeted for openoffice-2.4 (March 08), so table editing would be broken until then. Perhaps we already could include the patch? http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81936 Created attachment 132450 [details] Fix for this issue This upstream patch fixes this issue [1] and also another problem with not properly saved splitviews [2] on amd64. [1] http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81815 [2] http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81936 This patch is included in the latest version of ooo-build, so the regular updating to the newest ooo-build would be enough to fix this issue. (In reply to comment #10) > This patch is included in the latest version of ooo-build, so the regular > updating to the newest ooo-build would be enough to fix this issue. > I've just bumped the ooo-build-version to 2.3.0.3 (just rebuild openoffice-2.3.0 to get it), so this should be fixed, thanks for pushing this! Closing (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > This patch is included in the latest version of ooo-build, so the regular > > updating to the newest ooo-build would be enough to fix this issue. > > > > I've just bumped the ooo-build-version to 2.3.0.3 (just rebuild > openoffice-2.3.0 to get it), so this should be fixed, thanks for pushing this! > Closing > As far as I can see this issue was fixed after 2.3.0.3 was released, fortunately 2.3.0.4 was released a few hours ago and is already in portage, so please emerge --sync and try again. Sorry about the inconvenience. |
