Acknowledgement sent
to <[email protected]>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Debian TigerVNC Packaging Team <[email protected]>.
(Tue, 30 Sep 2014 01:33:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Package: libjpeg-dev
Version: 1:1.3.1-3
Surely there is something wrong with this.
This can be repeated indefinitely; there's something wrong with the
version checking.
It would be nice if somebody would fix reportbug, so we could use that
again.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758619
# apt-get install libjpeg-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
libjpeg-dev
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 876 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/48.3 kB of archives.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
Reading changelogs... Done
(Reading database ... 233968 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../libjpeg-dev_1%3a1.3.1-3_all.deb ...
Unpacking libjpeg-dev (1:1.3.1-3) over (1:1.3.1-3) ...
Acknowledgement sent
to Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian TigerVNC Packaging Team <[email protected]>.
(Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:21:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
My wild guess would be a clash between real package and a virtual one provided by libjpeg8-dev
Sent from Blue Mail
On 30. 9. 2014 3:33, at 3:33, [email protected] wrote:
>Package: libjpeg-dev
>Version: 1:1.3.1-3
>
>Surely there is something wrong with this.
>
>This can be repeated indefinitely; there's something wrong with the
>version checking.
>
>It would be nice if somebody would fix reportbug, so we could use that
>again.
>
>https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758619
>
>
># apt-get install libjpeg-dev
>Reading package lists... Done
>Building dependency tree
>Reading state information... Done
>The following packages will be upgraded:
> libjpeg-dev
>1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 876 not upgraded.
>Need to get 0 B/48.3 kB of archives.
>After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
>Reading changelogs... Done
>(Reading database ... 233968 files and directories currently
>installed.)
>Preparing to unpack .../libjpeg-dev_1%3a1.3.1-3_all.deb ...
>Unpacking libjpeg-dev (1:1.3.1-3) over (1:1.3.1-3) ...
Acknowledgement sent
to Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian TigerVNC Packaging Team <[email protected]>.
(Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:45:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Subject: Re: Bug#763412: libjpeg-dev reinstalls over itself
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:40:48 +0200
Control: reassign -1 apt
I can confirm the behaviour, but I just could find a cause,
it looks like some misbehaviour in apt, since everything
looks normal. Checksums are OK, the cache is OK, but
it just behaves weird.
I am reassigning this to apt.
More symptoms:
1. double listing of the package in apt-cache show output
# apt-cache show libjpeg-dev
Package: libjpeg-dev
Source: libjpeg-turbo
Version: 1:1.3.1-3
Installed-Size: 76
Maintainer: Debian TigerVNC Packaging Team
<[email protected]>
Architecture: all
Depends: libjpeg62-dev (>= 1:1.3.1-3)
Conflicts: libjpeg62-dev (<< 0:1.3.1-1~), libjpeg7-dev, libjpeg8-dev
Description-en: Development files for the JPEG library [dummy package]
This package depends on default Debian implementation of
libjpeg.so.62 JPEG library.
Description-md5: 169b0708f8d540a76b8b0c5710c4ebb6
Homepage: http://www.libjpeg-turbo.org/
Section: libdevel
Priority: optional
Filename: pool/main/libj/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-dev_1.3.1-3_all.deb
Size: 48318
MD5sum: c1532ef2ac175bd33d531fed7e373918
SHA1: 4fe33e26c8171630f5a144b630e6e4bbc0ae3551
SHA256: 27e9092e7ab784f298ef2dd231a972daac1f7d89a78f9c3edb18f9624fc230f6
Package: libjpeg-dev
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: libdevel
Installed-Size: 76
Maintainer: Debian TigerVNC Packaging Team
<[email protected]>
Architecture: all
Source: libjpeg-turbo
Version: 1:1.3.1-3
Depends: libjpeg62-dev (>= 1:1.3.1-3)
Conflicts: libjpeg62-dev (<< 1.3.1-1~), libjpeg7-dev, libjpeg8-dev
Description-en: Development files for the JPEG library [dummy package]
This package depends on default Debian implementation of
libjpeg.so.62 JPEG library.
Description-md5: 169b0708f8d540a76b8b0c5710c4ebb6
Homepage: http://www.libjpeg-turbo.org/
2. Same for apt-cache policy
# apt-cache policy libjpeg-dev
libjpeg-dev:
Installed: 1:1.3.1-3
Candidate: 1:1.3.1-3
Version table:
1:1.3.1-3 0
500 http://ftp.cz.debian.org/debian/ jessie/main amd64 Packages
500 http://ftp.cz.debian.org/debian/ sid/main amd64 Packages
*** 1:1.3.1-3 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
3. Reinstalling over and over:
root@kage:/var/cache/apt/archives# apt-get install libjpeg-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
libjpeg-dev
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 91 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/48,3 kB of archives.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
Reading changelogs... Done
(Reading database ... 214068 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../libjpeg-dev_1%3a1.3.1-3_all.deb ...
Unpacking libjpeg-dev (1:1.3.1-3) over (1:1.3.1-3) ...
root@kage:/var/cache/apt/archives# apt-get install libjpeg-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
libjpeg-dev
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 91 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/48,3 kB of archives.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
Reading changelogs... Done
(Reading database ... 214068 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../libjpeg-dev_1%3a1.3.1-3_all.deb ...
Unpacking libjpeg-dev (1:1.3.1-3) over (1:1.3.1-3) ...
Cheers,
Ondrej
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 03:29, [email protected] wrote:
> Package: libjpeg-dev
> Version: 1:1.3.1-3
>
> Surely there is something wrong with this.
>
> This can be repeated indefinitely; there's something wrong with the
> version checking.
>
> It would be nice if somebody would fix reportbug, so we could use that
> again.
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758619
>
>
> # apt-get install libjpeg-dev
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> libjpeg-dev
> 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 876 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0 B/48.3 kB of archives.
> After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
> Reading changelogs... Done
> (Reading database ... 233968 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to unpack .../libjpeg-dev_1%3a1.3.1-3_all.deb ...
> Unpacking libjpeg-dev (1:1.3.1-3) over (1:1.3.1-3) ...
>
--
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>
Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server
Acknowledgement sent
to Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to APT Development Team <[email protected]>.
(Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:54:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Subject: Re: Bug#763412: libjpeg-dev reinstalls over itself
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:50:23 +0200
Christoph Berg found the error in the package control fields
that is triggering error in dpkg/apt:
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 838a32a..0e1e58c 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Architecture: all
Section: libdevel
Depends: libjpeg62-dev (>= ${source:Version}),
${misc:Depends}
-Conflicts: libjpeg62-dev (<< 0:1.3.1-1~),
+Conflicts: libjpeg62-dev (<< 1:1.3.1-1~),
libjpeg7-dev,
libjpeg8-dev
Description: Development files for the JPEG library [dummy package]
I will upload fixed libjpeg-dev, but leave this bug open to be fixed
at correct place.
Cheers,
Ondrej
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 11:40, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 apt
>
> I can confirm the behaviour, but I just could find a cause,
> it looks like some misbehaviour in apt, since everything
> looks normal. Checksums are OK, the cache is OK, but
> it just behaves weird.
>
> I am reassigning this to apt.
>
> More symptoms:
>
> 1. double listing of the package in apt-cache show output
>
> # apt-cache show libjpeg-dev
> Package: libjpeg-dev
> Source: libjpeg-turbo
> Version: 1:1.3.1-3
> Installed-Size: 76
> Maintainer: Debian TigerVNC Packaging Team
> <[email protected]>
> Architecture: all
> Depends: libjpeg62-dev (>= 1:1.3.1-3)
> Conflicts: libjpeg62-dev (<< 0:1.3.1-1~), libjpeg7-dev, libjpeg8-dev
> Description-en: Development files for the JPEG library [dummy package]
> This package depends on default Debian implementation of
> libjpeg.so.62 JPEG library.
> Description-md5: 169b0708f8d540a76b8b0c5710c4ebb6
> Homepage: http://www.libjpeg-turbo.org/
> Section: libdevel
> Priority: optional
> Filename: pool/main/libj/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-dev_1.3.1-3_all.deb
> Size: 48318
> MD5sum: c1532ef2ac175bd33d531fed7e373918
> SHA1: 4fe33e26c8171630f5a144b630e6e4bbc0ae3551
> SHA256: 27e9092e7ab784f298ef2dd231a972daac1f7d89a78f9c3edb18f9624fc230f6
>
> Package: libjpeg-dev
> Status: install ok installed
> Priority: optional
> Section: libdevel
> Installed-Size: 76
> Maintainer: Debian TigerVNC Packaging Team
> <[email protected]>
> Architecture: all
> Source: libjpeg-turbo
> Version: 1:1.3.1-3
> Depends: libjpeg62-dev (>= 1:1.3.1-3)
> Conflicts: libjpeg62-dev (<< 1.3.1-1~), libjpeg7-dev, libjpeg8-dev
> Description-en: Development files for the JPEG library [dummy package]
> This package depends on default Debian implementation of
> libjpeg.so.62 JPEG library.
> Description-md5: 169b0708f8d540a76b8b0c5710c4ebb6
> Homepage: http://www.libjpeg-turbo.org/
>
> 2. Same for apt-cache policy
>
> # apt-cache policy libjpeg-dev
> libjpeg-dev:
> Installed: 1:1.3.1-3
> Candidate: 1:1.3.1-3
> Version table:
> 1:1.3.1-3 0
> 500 http://ftp.cz.debian.org/debian/ jessie/main amd64 Packages
> 500 http://ftp.cz.debian.org/debian/ sid/main amd64 Packages
> *** 1:1.3.1-3 0
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
>
> 3. Reinstalling over and over:
>
> root@kage:/var/cache/apt/archives# apt-get install libjpeg-dev
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> libjpeg-dev
> 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 91 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0 B/48,3 kB of archives.
> After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
> Reading changelogs... Done
> (Reading database ... 214068 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to unpack .../libjpeg-dev_1%3a1.3.1-3_all.deb ...
> Unpacking libjpeg-dev (1:1.3.1-3) over (1:1.3.1-3) ...
>
> root@kage:/var/cache/apt/archives# apt-get install libjpeg-dev
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> libjpeg-dev
> 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 91 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0 B/48,3 kB of archives.
> After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
> Reading changelogs... Done
> (Reading database ... 214068 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to unpack .../libjpeg-dev_1%3a1.3.1-3_all.deb ...
> Unpacking libjpeg-dev (1:1.3.1-3) over (1:1.3.1-3) ...
>
>
> Cheers,
> Ondrej
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 03:29, [email protected] wrote:
> > Package: libjpeg-dev
> > Version: 1:1.3.1-3
> >
> > Surely there is something wrong with this.
> >
> > This can be repeated indefinitely; there's something wrong with the
> > version checking.
> >
> > It would be nice if somebody would fix reportbug, so we could use that
> > again.
> >
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758619
> >
> >
> > # apt-get install libjpeg-dev
> > Reading package lists... Done
> > Building dependency tree
> > Reading state information... Done
> > The following packages will be upgraded:
> > libjpeg-dev
> > 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 876 not upgraded.
> > Need to get 0 B/48.3 kB of archives.
> > After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
> > Reading changelogs... Done
> > (Reading database ... 233968 files and directories currently installed.)
> > Preparing to unpack .../libjpeg-dev_1%3a1.3.1-3_all.deb ...
> > Unpacking libjpeg-dev (1:1.3.1-3) over (1:1.3.1-3) ...
> >
>
>
> --
> Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>
> Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server
--
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>
Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server
Acknowledgement sent
to "USPS TechConnect" <[email protected]>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to APT Development Team <[email protected]>.
(Sat, 28 Jan 2017 07:03:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Dear Customer,
We can not deliver your parcel arrived at January 24.
Please review delivery label in attachment!
Many thanks,
John Barton,
USPS Parcels Delivery Manager.