My wild guess would be a clash between real package and a virtual one provided by libjpeg8-dev

Sent from Blue Mail



On 30. 9. 2014 3:33, at 3:33, ian_bruce@mail.ru wrote:
>Package: libjpeg-dev
>Version: 1:1.3.1-3
>
>Surely there is something wrong with this.
>
>This can be repeated indefinitely; there's something wrong with the
>version checking.
>
>It would be nice if somebody would fix reportbug, so we could use that
>again.
>
>https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758619
>
>
># apt-get install libjpeg-dev
>Reading package lists... Done
>Building dependency tree       
>Reading state information... Done
>The following packages will be upgraded:
>  libjpeg-dev
>1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 876 not upgraded.
>Need to get 0 B/48.3 kB of archives.
>After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
>Reading changelogs... Done
>(Reading database ... 233968 files and directories currently
>installed.)
>Preparing to unpack .../libjpeg-dev_1%3a1.3.1-3_all.deb ...
>Unpacking libjpeg-dev (1:1.3.1-3) over (1:1.3.1-3) ...