runner: Rearrange 0-RTT code in server slightly

The point at which we flush is tricky for testing DTLS 1.3 ACKs. This
rearrangement is not sufficient to make that work, but I wanted to pull
this into a separately reviewable CL first. The changes are:

- We can derive keys and set the out keys very early

- I've removed the shouldSkipEarlyData() check. That check is
  unnecessary because we're already checking for whether the server
  accepted early data in EncryptedExtensions. (Also it doesn't make
  sense to apply that check to reading a bit of early data, but not to
  reading EndOfEarlyData. The conditions on those should match.)

Change-Id: Ie1909bb5f8a8a2aeab05ba0f95155ce45eb160f3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/72948
Reviewed-by: Nick Harper <[email protected]>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <[email protected]>
1 file changed
tree: 3bcdf5dbb79e04f7c4babe420d1290cefc3cbe8e
  1. .bcr/
  2. .github/
  3. cmake/
  4. crypto/
  5. decrepit/
  6. docs/
  7. fuzz/
  8. gen/
  9. include/
  10. infra/
  11. pki/
  12. rust/
  13. ssl/
  14. third_party/
  15. tool/
  16. util/
  17. .bazelignore
  18. .bazelrc
  19. .clang-format
  20. .gitignore
  21. API-CONVENTIONS.md
  22. BREAKING-CHANGES.md
  23. BUILD.bazel
  24. build.json
  25. BUILDING.md
  26. CMakeLists.txt
  27. codereview.settings
  28. CONTRIBUTING.md
  29. FUZZING.md
  30. go.mod
  31. go.sum
  32. INCORPORATING.md
  33. LICENSE
  34. MODULE.bazel
  35. MODULE.bazel.lock
  36. PORTING.md
  37. PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy
  38. README.md
  39. SANDBOXING.md
  40. STYLE.md
README.md

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: