Update tools and add a .bazelversion

So that MODULE.bazel.lock is actually checked to be up-to-date, we
should run with --lockfile_mode=error on CI. But since the lock file
format changes by Bazel version, that means we also need to pick a
particular Bazel version.

This matches the best practices documented here:
https://bazel.build/external/lockfile#best-practices

To update libc++, we now need to pull in a bit of LLVM libc. See
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-project-hand-in-hand-llvm-libc-libc-code-sharing/77701

Change-Id: I53b28067bab86d34be8c76625d6bedc23f0baeba
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/73487
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <[email protected]>
Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <[email protected]>
7 files changed
tree: b811d3c5d8ed33843902bb260abc537dcc99d34b
  1. .bcr/
  2. .github/
  3. cmake/
  4. crypto/
  5. decrepit/
  6. docs/
  7. fuzz/
  8. gen/
  9. include/
  10. infra/
  11. pki/
  12. rust/
  13. ssl/
  14. third_party/
  15. tool/
  16. util/
  17. .bazelignore
  18. .bazelrc
  19. .bazelversion
  20. .clang-format
  21. .gitignore
  22. API-CONVENTIONS.md
  23. BREAKING-CHANGES.md
  24. BUILD.bazel
  25. build.json
  26. BUILDING.md
  27. CMakeLists.txt
  28. codereview.settings
  29. CONTRIBUTING.md
  30. FUZZING.md
  31. go.mod
  32. go.sum
  33. INCORPORATING.md
  34. LICENSE
  35. MODULE.bazel
  36. MODULE.bazel.lock
  37. PORTING.md
  38. PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy
  39. README.md
  40. SANDBOXING.md
  41. STYLE.md
README.md

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: