Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:1811.02429 (cs)
[Submitted on 4 Nov 2018]

Title:Automatic Repair of Real Bugs in Java: A Large-Scale Experiment on the Defects4J Dataset

Authors:Matias Martinez, Thomas Durieux, Romain Sommerard, Jifeng Xuan, Martin Monperrus
View PDF
Abstract:Defects4J is a large, peer-reviewed, structured dataset of real-world Java bugs. Each bug in Defects4J comes with a test suite and at least one failing test case that triggers the bug. In this paper, we report on an experiment to explore the effectiveness of automatic test-suite based repair on Defects4J. The result of our experiment shows that the considered state-of-the-art repair methods can generate patches for 47 out of 224 bugs. However, those patches are only test-suite adequate, which means that they pass the test suite and may potentially be incorrect beyond the test-suite satisfaction correctness criterion. We have manually analyzed 84 different patches to assess their real correctness. In total, 9 real Java bugs can be correctly repaired with test-suite based repair. This analysis shows that test-suite based repair suffers from under-specified bugs, for which trivial or incorrect patches still pass the test suite. With respect to practical applicability, it takes on average 14.8 minutes to find a patch. The experiment was done on a scientific grid, totaling 17.6 days of computation time. All the repair systems and experimental results are publicly available on Github in order to facilitate future research on automatic repair.
Comments: Empirical Software Engineering, Springer, 2016. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1505.07002
Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as: arXiv:1811.02429 [cs.SE]
  (or arXiv:1811.02429v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1811.02429
Journal reference: Empirical Software Engineering, Springer, 2016
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9470-4

Submission history

From: Martin Monperrus [view email]
[v1] Sun, 4 Nov 2018 14:31:05 UTC (180 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.SE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-11
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Matias Martinez
Thomas Durieux
Romain Sommerard
Jifeng Xuan
Martin Monperrus
export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)