Computer Science > Data Structures and Algorithms
[Submitted on 24 Jul 2018 (v1), last revised 8 May 2019 (this version, v5)]
Title:Revisiting the Challenges of MaxClique
View PDFAbstract:The MaxClique problem, finding the largest complete subgraph in an Erd{ö}s-R{é}nyi $G(N,p)$ random graph in the large $N$ limit, is a well-known example of a simple problem for which finding any approximate solution within a factor of $2$ of the known, probabilistically determined limit, appears to require P$=$NP. This type of search has practical importance in very large graphs. Algorithmic approaches run into phase boundaries long before they reach the size of the largest likely solutions. And, most intriguing, there is an extensive literature of \textit{challenges} posed for concrete methods of finding maximum naturally occurring as well as artificially hidden cliques, with computational costs that are at most polynomial in the size of the problem.
We use the probabilistic approach in a novel way to provide a more insightful test of constructive algorithms for this problem. We show that extensions of existing methods of greedy local search will be able to meet the \textit{challenges} for practical problems of size $N$ as large as $10^{10}$ and perhaps more. Experiments with spectral methods that treat a single large clique of size $\alpha N^{1/2}$ \textit{planted} in the graph as an impurity level in a tight binding energy band show that such a clique can be detected when $\alpha \geq \approx1.0$. Belief propagation using a recent \textit{approximate message passing} (\textbf{AMP}) scheme of inference pushes this limit down to $\alpha \sim \sqrt{1/e}$. Exhaustive local search (with early stopping when the planted clique is found) does even better on problems of practical size, and proves to be the fastest solution method for this problem.
Submission history
From: Raffaele Marino [view email][v1] Tue, 24 Jul 2018 13:22:01 UTC (909 KB)
[v2] Sun, 16 Sep 2018 09:11:36 UTC (810 KB)
[v3] Mon, 6 May 2019 14:56:06 UTC (1,530 KB)
[v4] Tue, 7 May 2019 06:34:19 UTC (1,529 KB)
[v5] Wed, 8 May 2019 14:47:30 UTC (1,341 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.